Files
probo/pkg/iam/policy/evaluator_test.go
Sacha Al Himdani 4c57d201a4 Make license declarations consistently MIT
The source headers, LICENSE files, and license metadata had drifted
apart. Align the entire project to MIT:

- Convert every source-file header to the MIT text across all comment
  styles (Go, TS, TSX, JS, MJS, SQL, CSS, GraphQL, shell), including
  SPDX-License-Identifier tags
- Set the root and cookie-banner LICENSE files to the MIT text with a
  "MIT License" title line
- Switch the package.json license fields, Docker image label, and
  cookie-banner README to MIT
- Update docs and the genmodels header generator accordingly
- Normalize copyright lines to a single format
  (Copyright (c) <year(s)> Probo Inc <hello@probo.com>.): unify the
  hello@getprobo.com and hello@probo.inc emails to hello@probo.com and
  the comma-separated years to a hyphenated range

Genuine third-party references are intentionally left untouched: the
Lucide icon attributions (Lucide is ISC) and the trivy dependency
license allowlist.

Signed-off-by: Sacha Al Himdani <sacha@probo.com>
2026-07-13 16:21:14 +02:00

520 lines
13 KiB
Go

// Copyright (c) 2025-2026 Probo Inc <hello@probo.com>.
//
// Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
// of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
// in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
// to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
// copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
// furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
//
// The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
// all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
//
// THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
// IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
// FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
// AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
// LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
// OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
// SOFTWARE.
package policy
import (
"testing"
)
func TestEvaluator_Evaluate_AllowDecision(t *testing.T) {
evaluator := NewEvaluator()
policy := NewPolicy(
"test",
"Test Policy",
Allow("iam:identity:get", "iam:identity:update"),
)
tests := []struct {
name string
action string
want Decision
}{
{
name: "allowed action - get",
action: "iam:identity:get",
want: DecisionAllow,
},
{
name: "allowed action - update",
action: "iam:identity:update",
want: DecisionAllow,
},
{
name: "not allowed action",
action: "iam:identity:delete",
want: DecisionNoMatch,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
req := AuthorizationRequest{
Action: tt.action,
ConditionContext: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"id": "res_456"},
},
}
result := evaluator.Evaluate(req, []*Policy{policy})
if result.Decision != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Evaluate() decision = %v, want %v", result.Decision, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
func TestEvaluator_Evaluate_DenyDecision(t *testing.T) {
evaluator := NewEvaluator()
policy := NewPolicy(
"test",
"Test Policy",
Allow("iam:*:*"),
Deny("iam:organization:delete").WithSID("deny-org-delete"),
)
tests := []struct {
name string
action string
want Decision
}{
{
name: "allowed by wildcard",
action: "iam:identity:get",
want: DecisionAllow,
},
{
name: "denied explicitly",
action: "iam:organization:delete",
want: DecisionDeny,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
req := AuthorizationRequest{
Action: tt.action,
ConditionContext: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"id": "org_789"},
},
}
result := evaluator.Evaluate(req, []*Policy{policy})
if result.Decision != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Evaluate() decision = %v, want %v", result.Decision, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
func TestEvaluator_Evaluate_DenyWinsOverAllow(t *testing.T) {
evaluator := NewEvaluator()
// Two policies: one allows, one denies the same action
allowPolicy := NewPolicy(
"allow",
"Allow Policy",
Allow("iam:organization:delete"),
)
denyPolicy := NewPolicy(
"deny",
"Deny Policy",
Deny("iam:organization:delete"),
)
req := AuthorizationRequest{
Action: "iam:organization:delete",
ConditionContext: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"id": "org_789"},
},
}
// Deny should win regardless of order
t.Run("deny first", func(t *testing.T) {
result := evaluator.Evaluate(req, []*Policy{denyPolicy, allowPolicy})
if result.Decision != DecisionDeny {
t.Errorf("Expected Deny, got %v", result.Decision)
}
})
t.Run("allow first", func(t *testing.T) {
result := evaluator.Evaluate(req, []*Policy{allowPolicy, denyPolicy})
if result.Decision != DecisionDeny {
t.Errorf("Expected Deny, got %v", result.Decision)
}
})
}
func TestEvaluator_Evaluate_WithConditions(t *testing.T) {
evaluator := NewEvaluator()
// Policy that only allows users to update their own identity
selfManagePolicy := NewPolicy(
"self-manage",
"Self Manage",
Allow("iam:identity:update").
When(Equals("principal.id", "resource.id")),
)
tests := []struct {
name string
principalID string
resourceID string
want Decision
}{
{
name: "condition satisfied - same user",
principalID: "user_123",
resourceID: "user_123",
want: DecisionAllow,
},
{
name: "condition not satisfied - different user",
principalID: "user_123",
resourceID: "user_456",
want: DecisionNoMatch,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
req := AuthorizationRequest{
Action: "iam:identity:update",
ConditionContext: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": tt.principalID},
Resource: map[string]string{"id": tt.resourceID},
},
}
result := evaluator.Evaluate(req, []*Policy{selfManagePolicy})
if result.Decision != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Evaluate() decision = %v, want %v", result.Decision, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
func TestEvaluator_Evaluate_MultipleConditions(t *testing.T) {
evaluator := NewEvaluator()
// Policy that requires both conditions to be met
policy := NewPolicy(
"test",
"Test",
Allow("documents:document:update").
When(
Equals("principal.id", "resource.owner_id"),
Equals("resource.status", "draft"),
),
)
tests := []struct {
name string
ctx ConditionContext
want Decision
}{
{
name: "both conditions satisfied",
ctx: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"owner_id": "user_123", "status": "draft"},
},
want: DecisionAllow,
},
{
name: "first condition not satisfied",
ctx: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"owner_id": "user_456", "status": "draft"},
},
want: DecisionNoMatch,
},
{
name: "second condition not satisfied",
ctx: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"owner_id": "user_123", "status": "published"},
},
want: DecisionNoMatch,
},
{
name: "neither condition satisfied",
ctx: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"owner_id": "user_456", "status": "published"},
},
want: DecisionNoMatch,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
req := AuthorizationRequest{
Action: "documents:document:update",
ConditionContext: tt.ctx,
}
result := evaluator.Evaluate(req, []*Policy{policy})
if result.Decision != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Evaluate() decision = %v, want %v", result.Decision, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
func TestEvaluator_Evaluate_WildcardActions(t *testing.T) {
evaluator := NewEvaluator()
tests := []struct {
name string
policy *Policy
action string
want Decision
}{
{
name: "full wildcard allows everything",
policy: NewPolicy("test", "Test", Allow("*")),
action: "any:action:here",
want: DecisionAllow,
},
{
name: "service wildcard",
policy: NewPolicy("test", "Test", Allow("iam:*:*")),
action: "iam:identity:get",
want: DecisionAllow,
},
{
name: "service wildcard no match",
policy: NewPolicy("test", "Test", Allow("iam:*:*")),
action: "documents:document:read",
want: DecisionNoMatch,
},
{
name: "operation wildcard",
policy: NewPolicy("test", "Test", Allow("iam:identity:*")),
action: "iam:identity:delete",
want: DecisionAllow,
},
{
name: "read operations only",
policy: NewPolicy("test", "Test", Allow("*:*:get", "*:*:list")),
action: "iam:identity:get",
want: DecisionAllow,
},
{
name: "read operations only - write denied",
policy: NewPolicy("test", "Test", Allow("*:*:get", "*:*:list")),
action: "iam:identity:update",
want: DecisionNoMatch,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
req := AuthorizationRequest{
Action: tt.action,
ConditionContext: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"id": "res_456"},
},
}
result := evaluator.Evaluate(req, []*Policy{tt.policy})
if result.Decision != tt.want {
t.Errorf("Evaluate() decision = %v, want %v", result.Decision, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
func TestEvaluator_Evaluate_EmptyPolicies(t *testing.T) {
evaluator := NewEvaluator()
req := AuthorizationRequest{
Action: "iam:identity:get",
ConditionContext: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"id": "res_456"},
},
}
result := evaluator.Evaluate(req, []*Policy{})
if result.Decision != DecisionNoMatch {
t.Errorf("Expected NoMatch for empty policies, got %v", result.Decision)
}
}
func TestEvaluator_Evaluate_NilPolicies(t *testing.T) {
evaluator := NewEvaluator()
req := AuthorizationRequest{
Action: "iam:identity:get",
ConditionContext: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"id": "res_456"},
},
}
result := evaluator.Evaluate(req, nil)
if result.Decision != DecisionNoMatch {
t.Errorf("Expected NoMatch for nil policies, got %v", result.Decision)
}
}
func TestEvaluator_Evaluate_MatchedStatementAndPolicy(t *testing.T) {
evaluator := NewEvaluator()
policy := NewPolicy(
"test-policy",
"Test Policy",
Allow("iam:identity:get").WithSID("allow-get"),
Deny("iam:identity:delete").WithSID("deny-delete"),
)
t.Run("matched allow statement", func(t *testing.T) {
req := AuthorizationRequest{
Action: "iam:identity:get",
ConditionContext: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"id": "res_456"},
},
}
result := evaluator.Evaluate(req, []*Policy{policy})
if result.MatchedStatement == nil {
t.Fatal("Expected matched statement")
}
if result.MatchedStatement.SID != "allow-get" {
t.Errorf("Expected SID 'allow-get', got %q", result.MatchedStatement.SID)
}
if result.MatchedPolicy == nil {
t.Fatal("Expected matched policy")
}
if result.MatchedPolicy.ID != "test-policy" {
t.Errorf("Expected policy ID 'test-policy', got %q", result.MatchedPolicy.ID)
}
})
t.Run("matched deny statement", func(t *testing.T) {
req := AuthorizationRequest{
Action: "iam:identity:delete",
ConditionContext: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"id": "res_456"},
},
}
result := evaluator.Evaluate(req, []*Policy{policy})
if result.MatchedStatement == nil {
t.Fatal("Expected matched statement")
}
if result.MatchedStatement.SID != "deny-delete" {
t.Errorf("Expected SID 'deny-delete', got %q", result.MatchedStatement.SID)
}
})
t.Run("no match - no statement or policy", func(t *testing.T) {
req := AuthorizationRequest{
Action: "iam:identity:update",
ConditionContext: ConditionContext{
Principal: map[string]string{"id": "user_123"},
Resource: map[string]string{"id": "res_456"},
},
}
result := evaluator.Evaluate(req, []*Policy{policy})
if result.MatchedStatement != nil {
t.Error("Expected no matched statement")
}
if result.MatchedPolicy != nil {
t.Error("Expected no matched policy")
}
})
}
func TestEvaluationResult_IsAllowed(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
decision Decision
want bool
}{
{DecisionAllow, true},
{DecisionDeny, false},
{DecisionNoMatch, false},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(string(tt.decision), func(t *testing.T) {
result := EvaluationResult{Decision: tt.decision}
if result.IsAllowed() != tt.want {
t.Errorf("IsAllowed() = %v, want %v", result.IsAllowed(), tt.want)
}
})
}
}
func TestEvaluationResult_PolicyID(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
result := EvaluationResult{
Decision: DecisionAllow,
MatchedStatement: &Statement{
SID: "read-thirdParties",
},
MatchedPolicy: &Policy{
ID: "probo:viewer",
},
}
if got := result.PolicyID(); got != "read-thirdParties" {
t.Errorf("PolicyID() = %q, want read-thirdParties", got)
}
}
func TestEvaluationResult_Reason(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
t.Run("implicit deny includes role", func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
result := EvaluationResult{Decision: DecisionNoMatch}
want := "implicit deny: no matching allow for role VIEWER"
if got := result.Reason("VIEWER"); got != want {
t.Errorf("Reason() = %q, want %q", got, want)
}
})
t.Run("explicit deny uses statement sid", func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
result := EvaluationResult{
Decision: DecisionDeny,
MatchedStatement: &Statement{
SID: "deny-delete",
},
}
want := "explicit deny by statement deny-delete"
if got := result.Reason("ADMIN"); got != want {
t.Errorf("Reason() = %q, want %q", got, want)
}
})
}